Speed Camera Flashed but I wasn't speeding should I worry (WA)?

[aussiblue]

Just coming home along the Roe Hwy heading west at around 5.15pm sitting on the 100km speed limit with cruise control on and a tripod mounted speed camera flashed at me. There would be, as far as I can figure, be no other cars in their happy snap frame.

A car had just sped past me I guess at about 180 km/hr (my estimate - new yellow V8 Holden going flat strap) but I think it would have been well past the camera when it flashed me. I gently braked when I saw the camera so i was doing less than 90 km/he or maybe even as low as 80 km./he when it flashed me. Given its a double demerits double fine long weekend I am going to be even more annoyed if I am wrongly booked. I guess having my wife and son in the car as witnesses to the fact I wasn't speeding won't help if the technology has failed even with my clean-skin licence.

Am I worrying unnecessarily; do these WA camera's flash randomly to calibrate or something

[Tha Jack]

I hated that about WA.Double demerits- double fines is a good thing but not if you get done.WA is a police state! You should be right. If not, dispute it. Best of luck.

[DoreSlamR]

If old mate in the Holden was doing 180 and got flashed, we should be hearing about him on the news...dopey bastard

[Jeeepers]

Originally Posted by aussiblue

Just coming home along the Roe Hwy heading west at around 5.15pm sitting on the 100km speed limit with cruise control on and a tripod mounted speed camera flashed at me. There would be, as far as I can figure, be no other cars in their happy snap frame.

A car had just sped past me I guess at about 180 km/hr (my estimate - new yellow V8 Holden going flat strap) but I think it would have been well past the camera when it flashed me. I gently braked when I saw the camera so i was doing less than 90 km/he or maybe even as low as 80 km./he when it flashed me. Given its a double demerits double fine long weekend I am going to be even more annoyed if I am wrongly booked. I guess having my wife and son in the car as witnesses to the fact I wasn't speeding won't help if the technology has failed even with my clean-skin licence.

Am I worrying unnecessarily; do these WA camera's flash randomly to calibrate or something

Was there any traffic in the other direction? As depending on the road width and angle, these puppies shoot both directions.

[Geez Louise]

WA camera's only shoot one direction...At least they put a sign up saying...You have just passed a multinova! They should put on the end of that. Have a nice day!

[TwistedEL]

Where on Roe Hwy was it?

You said you were heading west, if you had been heading east between orrong rd and tonkin hwy that is an 80 zone and it's heavily enforced

They don't flash randomly as far as I know but if there was a bloke in hi-vis nearby he sets it off to calibrate / test when it is being set up

Could also be possible that the bloke doing 180 went through it and it didn't go off, maybe the operator was checking it?

Anyway just wait 3 months for the fine to be sent out, if you weren't doing anything wrong have faith you won't be fined and if you are, deal with it then

[UU TS50]

I think ive heard before that they can flash you even if your not speeding
id say you have nothing to worry about

[aussiblue]

if you had been heading east between orrong rd and tonkin hwy that is an 80 zone and it's heavily enforc

No not there it was much further west just before Nicholson road I think. There wasn't a the normal little speed camera sign on the side of the road after it so perhaps they were just setting up. A neighbour also says he thinks he heard on the radio thatthey were snapping all cars to check to see if drivers were wearing seat belts; anyone else heard that story?

[TwistedEL]

Originally Posted by aussiblue

A neighbour also says he thinks he heard on the radio thatthey were snapping all cars to check to see if drivers were wearing seat belts; anyone else heard that story?

I have heard that before but I dismissed it as BS. Maybe it's true.

[Geez Louise]

Yeah...they do that too. I remember they did that about 4 years ago...out of 200 cars...they caught 45 people(or thereabouts) One was a mother with 5 kids in a van..all without seatbelts! Parent of the year award goes too....

[Bossxr8]

I've been flashed by a camera before when I was under the limit, never got a fine so you should be fine.

[anarchyok]

I've been flashes a few times when under and never got the fine. Not sure why.

[SIKXR8220]

Happened to me on Albany hwy in Kenwick about 5 months ago same story wasn't speeding copped the flash muttered a few curses took the car to the mechanic thinking my speedo was out it wasn't never received a fine. So hopefully you will be safe.

[Geez Louise]

Just spoke to a mate of mine (Camera Operator...Dont shoot me for having this mate!) and he said one in every 8 flashes is a safety flash...don't know how true that is...but fingers crossed you were the 8th!

[goldfire]

Originally Posted by Geez Louise

Just spoke to a mate of mine (Camera Operator...Dont shoot me for having this mate!) and he said one in every 8 flashes is a safety flash...don't know how true that is...but fingers crossed you were the 8th!

I struggle to understand the need for a "Safety" flash?. I could understand maybe one or two calibration and test flashes but not a "Safety" flash. Could you get some clarification from your friend?. If not for our (the forum community) benefit, then for mine via pm as I'm rather curious.

Thankyou in advance.

[JC]

Originally Posted by goldfire

I struggle to understand the need for a "Safety" flash?. I could understand maybe one or two calibration and test flashes but not a "Safety" flash. Could you get some clarification from your friend?. If not for our (the forum community) benefit, then for mine via pm as I'm rather curious.

Thankyou in advance.

It's probably so that when you see the flash, you slow down - hence increased "safety" by keeping people at or below the speed limit, in addition to booking those over the limit.

[goldfire]

Originally Posted by JC

It's probably so that when you see the flash, you slow down - hence increased "safety" by keeping people at or below the speed limit, in addition to booking those over the limit.

Well you raise a valid point and it's all certainly good and true if it apply's, however the entire premise of the nova's is to take a photo of anyone going above the set speed limit and to penalize them via fines and demerits, a "safety" flash would do no more than cause un-due hardship on the poor person caught in it if they where abiding by the limit. I suggest that perhaps the OP perhaps might have a 2nd vehicle in the photo, therefor to my understanding and experience rendering the "Flash" useless as a means to identify the wrong doer at the time. Failing that we as the communtity and as people must atleast consider the fact that we as humans are not in-fallable and therefor must consider the fact that the OP believed and felt their cruise was set to the appropriate limit for that zone, but however they may have been mistaken for what ever reason can be presented.

[fmc351]

OP, make a note of as much detail as you can and deal with the fine if and when it comes up. Even better is some photos of the scene to demonstrate traffic conditions, weather and the cameras position in reference to the road variables (hills, corners, traffic signals and signs etc etc). Make note of where you were going, where you came from, this may indicate your attitude on the road. This should be done as close to the time of the event as possible while the facts are still clear in your head. All this helps to explain the situation, it wont get you off, but does help if to clearly explain your case if you should need to.

Even though it sounds stupid, make a note of why you felt the need to take notes and photos. You saw the flash, and knew you werent speeding and the nature of the camera fine process left you no other course of action to protect yourself from an erroneous flash.

Originally Posted by goldfire

Well you raise a valid point and it's all certainly good and true if it apply's, however the entire premise of the nova's is to take a photo of anyone going above the set speed limit and to penalize them via fines and demerits, a "safety" flash would do no more than cause un-due hardship on the poor person caught in it if they where abiding by the limit. I suggest that perhaps the OP perhaps might have a 2nd vehicle in the photo, therefor to my understanding and experience rendering the "Flash" useless as a means to identify the wrong doer at the time. Failing that we as the communtity and as people must atleast consider the fact that we as humans are not in-fallable and therefor must consider the fact that the OP believed and felt their cruise was set to the appropriate limit for that zone, but however they may have been mistaken for what ever reason can be presented.

On these boards Im normally on the side of law enforcement and traffic enforcement in particular, but I have to point out that machines of any kind fail and give erroneous results.

I like cameras because they free up limited resources (Police and funding) to pursue other avenues of their job, but there are issues IMO in absolute acceptance of their reliability and accuracy. Those issues should not be ignored when they result in a miscarriage of justice. On the freeing of resources issue, the problem is governments will use them to cull Police numbers using cost cutting as the mantra, not improve the valuable service Police provide by increasing numbers from to the revenue and deploying them more effectively into other aspects of their job.

[TwistedEL]

Originally Posted by JC

It's probably so that when you see the flash, you slow down - hence increased "safety" by keeping people at or below the speed limit, in addition to booking those over the limit.

I doubt it, weren't they at one stage intorducing infra red (invisible) flashes so as to not give away the position of the camera?
I'm not talking about the red flashes at night

[JC]

Originally Posted by TwistedEL

I doubt it, weren't they at one stage intorducing infra red (invisible) flashes so as to not give away the position of the camera?
I'm not talking about the red flashes at night

Yeh, I was being optimistic that visibility and prevention is usually better than fines to enforce a law.

How many people speed when they know a police car is just ahead or just behind them? Not many. How many speed when they think there's no police around - almost everyone, I'd reckon (and 1 km/h over is still considered speeding)!

[OLDFORDNUT]

ive never had one flash without a fine attached soon after, ring the relevant people and tell them what happened before any fine comes your way,that would be much more convincing than complaining after a fine as im sure lots do trying to bluff their way out.

[TwistedEL]

A phone call means nothing
A letter means slightly more but probably nothing
The only way to have your say is send your letter after you get the infringement notice. At least then you will get a response (probably will say tick the box to have the fine contested in court)

[I FluXx I]

hehe my radar detector picked that camera up yesterday. Picked one up on tonkin last night to.

[goldfire]

If your cruise was set to under the speed limit then you can argue that point SHOULD you be fined. However as I believe and as I have experieinced first hand if the other person is in the same shot as you are within 1/2 or so car length ( to take into account camera shutter speed etc) then you won't be fined as there are 2 cars in the photo.

I saw a kerb side cash register flash with me and another car screaming up the inside lane of me on Albany Hwy once, that was nearly 2 years ago and no fine so, if ATLEAST your car is in the same frame as another, you can argue that you wheren't the target.

[JC]

Originally Posted by aussiblue

Just coming home along the Roe Hwy heading west at around 5.15pm sitting on the 100km speed limit with cruise control on and a tripod mounted speed camera flashed at me. There would be, as far as I can figure, be no other cars in their happy snap frame.

A car had just sped past me I guess at about 180 km/hr (my estimate - new yellow V8 Holden going flat strap) but I think it would have been well past the camera when it flashed me. I gently braked when I saw the camera so i was doing less than 90 km/he or maybe even as low as 80 km./he when it flashed me. Given its a double demerits double fine long weekend I am going to be even more annoyed if I am wrongly booked. I guess having my wife and son in the car as witnesses to the fact I wasn't speeding won't help if the technology has failed even with my clean-skin licence.

Am I worrying unnecessarily; do these WA camera's flash randomly to calibrate or something

Why would you slow down to 90 or even 80, if the speed limit was 100 and you were doing 100. If you really did this, then you deserve a ticket just for slowing down!

[goldfire]

Originally Posted by aussiblue

Just coming home along the Roe Hwy heading west at around 5.15pm sitting on the 100km speed limit with cruise control on and a tripod mounted speed camera flashed at me. There would be, as far as I can figure, be no other cars in their happy snap frame.

A car had just sped past me I guess at about 180 km/hr (my estimate - new yellow V8 Holden going flat strap) but I think it would have been well past the camera when it flashed me. I gently braked when I saw the camera so i was doing less than 90 km/he or maybe even as low as 80 km./he when it flashed me. Given its a double demerits double fine long weekend I am going to be even more annoyed if I am wrongly booked. I guess having my wife and son in the car as witnesses to the fact I wasn't speeding won't help if the technology has failed even with my clean-skin licence.

Am I worrying unnecessarily; do these WA camera's flash randomly to calibrate or something

I just re-read your post, and please forgive me for asking this, but if you where anywhere between tonkin and kwinana there would be almost no way you'd be alone on the road at ANY point in time at 17:15.

I know Roe VERY well and again I'm sorry, but if you where anywhere between those 2 roads then It'd be the first if you where snapped individually as I've experienced more times than I wish to just how busy Roe can get at those times.

[IDT]

Originally Posted by aussiblue

Just coming home along the Roe Hwy heading west at around 5.15pm sitting on the 100km speed limit with cruise control on and a tripod mounted speed camera flashed at me. There would be, as far as I can figure, be no other cars in their happy snap frame.

A car had just sped past me I guess at about 180 km/hr (my estimate - new yellow V8 Holden going flat strap) but I think it would have been well past the camera when it flashed me. I gently braked when I saw the camera so i was doing less than 90 km/he or maybe even as low as 80 km./he when it flashed me. Given its a double demerits double fine long weekend I am going to be even more annoyed if I am wrongly booked. I guess having my wife and son in the car as witnesses to the fact I wasn't speeding won't help if the technology has failed even with my clean-skin licence.

Am I worrying unnecessarily; do these WA camera's flash randomly to calibrate or something

An there has been one on the Mitchel all weekend got me saturday night(doing just under 110) waiting for the mail. Revenue is up this weekend. Last time it took nearly three months to get the fine in the mail. Disputed it as I said how could i possibly remember who was driving. I ended up paying the fine. So just forget about it. If it comes in the mail deal with it then

[Gobes32]

Do the cameras in Vic take your photo in both directions. My friend is suggesting they cant flash oncoming traffic due to the blinding dangers of doing so?

[Dauphin]

Originally Posted by acosta32

Do the cameras in Vic take your photo in both directions. My friend is suggesting they cant flash oncoming traffic due to the blinding dangers of doing so?

I was watching one out the front of my house in Victoria and it flashed at vehicles coming and going from it.

Off-topic, the other day I learnt that a friend was doing 60 in a 50 zone and got flashed. She then did a U-turn to try and find out where it was and got done for doing 60 again. She got two fines in the mail for that day.

[XR6_661]

I pulled out of a driveway one day, was doing no more than 30kph in a 60zone and got flashed, so I turned around and went and knocked on the police landcruiser window, said to the cop, 'Oh you just flashed me when I pulled out of the driveway?' his reply was, "you're right mate, was just a test flash."

So it could be the same as that....if you weren't speeding, I wouldn't worry mate.