|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
13-08-2008, 10:54 AM | #10 | ||
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Yes they can. As an Economics major, I'm sick of hearing all this tariff crap. Tariffs are only short term, people only understand one language. That's money.
A tariff may keep someone in a $40,000 job, but will generally cost the government about $200,000 when the costs are considered. The people receiving the money will lobby for it and it will get the vote because it seems like a good idea in theory and the money is spread out so people don't feel they're losing. Tariff's simply subsidise ineffective production and it leads to the economy being much worse off. You people here should be thankful tariffs exist. A Falcon/Commodore would cost about $140,000 if it was completely Australian owned/made. There's no such thing as an Australian car anymore because consumers got it cheaper when other people did it. Same with Australian t-shirts. Would you happily pay $90 for a t-shirt which you could get the same quality Chinese one for $20? Most people would say no, but then would say that Australian jobs moved to China is a bad thing. Bunch of hypocrites I say. Take a look around your house and see how much of it is there because of oversea's manufacturers. I'd say close to 99%. If Australia closed off trade, it would be us that would bear the brunt. About tariffs. Instead of you paying $140,000 for a Falcon, the government picks up the bill for the remaining $100,000. Most people favour this because the cost is so spread out, but it just harms Australia in the long run. Some tariffs are good, but Australia is going nuts with their 17th century mercantilist approach. I say cut the tariffs further. |
||
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|