|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
08-02-2011, 07:25 AM | #11 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,373
|
My point is:
Small cars start around the $20K mark where as mid sized cars begin at near $28K, that big price jump is a huge hurdle to people on low wages facing finance. Now imagine another $8,000 on top of that and you begin to see Falcon's problem. Add to that, the the perception of size difference between large cars and mid size cars is much less these days but pricing does not reflect that change. Instead of packaging Falcon as Falcon/Fairlane with I-6/V8 engines, I think that Ford would attract more buyers by spanning the Mid sized-large car sectors with a Turbo I-4/V6/Turbo V6 and diesels. The game plan for the next Falcon must change to make it lighter and more appealing to buyers, customer's tastes are changing and Ford needs to follow those trends. Falcon can never be a small car but there's a great opportunity for the next product cycle to span two lucrative segments and increase sales by changing buyer perception of the once big thirsty Falcon to an efficient car designed for the 21st century. |
||