New Star Trek Movie Trailer

[CSV_LS1]

Just watched the new trailer with much excitement expecting to be blown away.
Can someone please watch it and tell me it doesn't look as horrible as i think?
Should be on Top Gears 'What Were They Thinking'.

http://www.apple.com/trailers/paramount/startrek/

[irlewy86]

Originally Posted by CSV_LS1

Just watched the new trailer with much excitement expecting to be blown away.
Can someone please watch it and tell me it doesn't look as horrible as i think?
Should be on Top Gears 'What Were They Thinking'.

http://www.apple.com/trailers/paramount/startrek/

I like it, but then this similey : gives me hours of entertainment as well

[blackwood]

I think it's going to be great. A total "re-boot" of the franchise, much in the same vein as Batman Begins.

I got excited just watching the trailer. Can't wait!

[blueoval]

I like the look of this. Definitely one to watch

[Jeeepers]

Bring it on..... Most of us were too young to remember the Original series as new episodes. This looks to be the start of a long adventure. The trailer looks great, and I look forward to the release.

[hannem]

Hmmm,
Can't view the trailer even though I downloaded the latest version of quicktime????

[Jason[98.EL]]

Originally Posted by hannem

Hmmm,
Can't view the trailer even though I downloaded the latest version of quicktime????

re start your computer i had the same issue till i re started

Grimus

[Clarke AV]

i will see if the IMAX is getting it on a DMR

[hannem]

Originally Posted by Grimus

re start your computer i had the same issue till i re started

Grimus

Success,
Muchly thanks for that tip Grimus, it worked great. Cheers

[Jason[98.EL]]

Originally Posted by hannem

Success,
Muchly thanks for that tip Grimus, it worked great. Cheers

no probs

[flappist]

Originally Posted by CSV_LS1

Just watched the new trailer with much excitement expecting to be blown away.
Can someone please watch it and tell me it doesn't look as horrible as i think?
Should be on Top Gears 'What Were They Thinking'.

http://www.apple.com/trailers/paramount/startrek/

Star trek, I believe, went far to "airy fairy" "star wars" with TNG, DS9 and Voyager due to the real world influences of the period. Political correctness at warp factor 9.
The later Enterprise series had far more depth and synergy to current reality with the characters behaving in a far more human and less altruistic manner (well the human ones anyway) and the technology being far less reliable or stable than the above.

The new movie, I suspect, is an attempt to expand the characters of Kirk, Spock et al by depicting their early years, interactions and the sociatal conditions that allowed then to become the icons of human spirit depicted in TOS and the first 6 movies.

It should be quite good as long as they don't lose the plot.

[CSV_LS1]

Originally Posted by flappist

Star trek, I believe, went far to "airy fairy" "star wars" with TNG, DS9 and Voyager due to the real world influences of the period. Political correctness at warp factor 9.
The later Enterprise series had far more depth and synergy to current reality with the characters behaving in a far more human and less altruistic manner (well the human ones anyway) and the technology being far less reliable or stable than the above.

The new movie, I suspect, is an attempt to expand the characters of Kirk, Spock et al by depicting their early years, interactions and the sociatal conditions that allowed then to become the icons of human spirit depicted in TOS and the first 6 movies.

It should be quite good as long as they don't lose the plot.

I agree it's a good direction to take. Just not convinced on the casting. Spok and Kirk doesn't seem to be right. Pretty baseless judgement from just a movie trailer i know. I just hope it's not the case when it's released.

[Falcon Coupe]

It may not follow the traditional path but looks quite entertaining none the less.

[Lukeyson]

it looks awesome IMO

[Keepleft]

The tailer is out already?! God time flies. Big ST and SciFi fan here.

[Yaw]

I think it's a mistake to go backwards. IMO they screwed James bond and looks like this too. Star Trek lost me at the enterprise series, Voyager was great, DS9 was ok, but Sisco is boring, Next Generation was once again ok but Picard never did anything for himself, Picard was a wus. Both the original Kirk and Janeway went where angels fear to tread.

[Creampuff]

The trailer looks great, I hope the movie follows.

[csv8]

Zachary Quinto (Sylar from Heroes) is so much like Leonard Nimoy, its spooky !!!

[Fev]

the action etc looks pretty cool but i'm thinking its going to be a major letdown. i guess we wont know til it comes out though!

[Yellow_Festiva]

Originally Posted by csv8

Zachary Quinto (Sylar from Heroes) is so much like Leonard Nimoy, its spooky !!!

You meant 'Spocky' right lol.. :

Anyway.. the traliers look great.. very much looking fwd to seeing this ;)

[Spanrz]

Just downloading the trailer now.

Originally Posted by flappist

Star trek, I believe, went far to "airy fairy" "star wars" with TNG, DS9 and Voyager due to the real world influences of the period.

Tend to disagree there a little.

Being somewhat of a trekkie, yeah ok laugh u may, but Voyager was significant to it's success (the latter of the Trek franchise).

TNG was just a stepping stone, took me a while to like it, but after season 1, I got into it.
Voyager, ruled.
DS9 well a spin off of Voyager, it did lack somewhat good intentions. But had some good plots.
Enterprise, well that was like going from windows 2000 to XP. Definately a different kettle of fish, I didn't like it at the start, but I did watch some episodes, which were good, but not enough to keep good faith.
When it's called "enterprise", unfortunately it's got a namesake to live up to.

It was a bit like watching "farscape". I am a sci-fi lover, but even farscape sent me over the wall.

Trailer 1 = Not enough content, but leads a lot to imagine about
Trailer 2 = Looks great, yes definately a ep 1 and ep 2 of the star wars type of feel. I've always wondered if they ever were going to venture the "before" for Kirk and Spock.

All these movies these days, seems now to follow a trend, as Lucas started a trend.
Make a movie in the core of what you are tring to tell, if they like it, then you can explore the latter stages (sequels etc).
Then everyones minds go on asking "what happened before, how did they get there"??

So to make lots of $$$, make your movie saga a threequel = Core -> Later -> Earlier

Hopefully Bana does a good character and not bring the aussie to shame ;)

[BFZ Wagon]

I finally got to see the new 'trailer' It looks interesting but I'll wait till I see it next year to give more of my opinion. However, I'm already a bit wary of this new movie due to it being done by the 'Lost guy' J.J. Abrams. I'm not really a fan of his work.

I LOVE Sci-Fi and all things Star Trek though so will see it anyway even if it does turn out to be a bit 'iffy'.

BTW, DS9 came out in 1993 and was the first Trek series after Next Generation, then Voyager came along in 1995, then Enterprise in 2001. Then.... well the end of the 'Trek' road till now!

Also, we get to see Eric Bana as the Romulan bad guy. It's good to see this very talented comedian/actor doing well. He's come a long way since his early days in Full Frontal :P

Ok, Nerd rant over

[JMO]

I don't know what to think watching that trailer. Lots of action though so it should be an alright movie. I wonder if the new guy is gonna talk with the Shatner stagger?

Oh and FARSCAPE ROCKS!!!!!!!! BRING IT BACK PLEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAASSSSSSSEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!

[blueoval]

Voyager - Seven of 9 FTMFW

[Spanrz]

Originally Posted by blueoval

Voyager - Seven of 9 FTMFW

I can imagine 7 of 9 out of the suit. Hmmmmmmmm.

"In 1989, Ryan was chosen Miss Illinois. She was the third runner-up in the 1990 Miss America Pageant, winning the preliminary swimsuit competition."

I can see why she won the swimsuit.... ..

[Laminge]

Originally Posted by irlewy86

I like it, but then this similey : gives me hours of entertainment as well

Gold, finally a post that made me smile!

[blueoval]

BA Waggn - you bloody legend. I dont know how Im gonna work with wood in my pants now. :P

[flappist]

Originally Posted by blueoval

BA Waggn - you bloody legend. I dont know how Im gonna work with wood in my pants now. :P

You do realise that her boobs are fake and built into the borgsuit. Look at her real ones in "Boston Public". Nice but not spectacular.

[blueoval]

Originally Posted by flappist

You do realise that her boobs are fake and built into the borgsuit. Look at her real ones in "Boston Public". Nice but not spectacular.

I understand this. Thanks. Its the rest of the package that is also very : worthy.

[Spanrz]

Originally Posted by flappist

You do realise that her boobs are fake and built into the borgsuit. Look at her real ones in "Boston Public". Nice but not spectacular.

Understand, but hey, we are on topic of "Star Trek" aren't we?
And it's the Star Trek view I'm coming from and sticking to it. ;)

Always wondered how she didn't have "headlights" switched on at all. Was hoping they would get into a cold or wet scene to see what happened ;) Thanks for the heads up tho.
I seen that pic, and boy couldn't resist ;)

I just hope they have a good plot to the movie. You can have all the stars you want, but without a good story for the actors to fill in, it will hard to justify a great release.

Just like, I just like DS9, but love Voyager. Even though it's the same genre, DS9 rates differently (lower) because of certain stories just don't carry with the actors.
*Cross fingers*

EDIT:
Arhhhh, just found this, boy, so close, but yet so far! Hoping she would jump into a "star shaped figure".
*waits for that moment, and thinks it could be like women on trampolines like on the Man Show*

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/171793...yan_surprised/