Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 18-08-2007, 12:59 AM   #31
gtfpv
GT
 
gtfpv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: SYDNEY
Posts: 9,205
Default

20 % HAS ALWAYS BEEN THE ACCEPTED RULE. FOR A MANUAL. . this is a rule of thumb for all engineering design . an 80 tonne shackle is capable of lifting 100 tonne safely.
friction losses of rotating gears equate to 20% . it doesnot get better with modern times, it's a fact.
i was told during my apprentiship is the late 80's that all machines with rotating and recipricating parts lose power due to linear forces on rotating parts and surface friction. which equates to a measured 20 % loss on a vehicle driveline.
obviously the more gears the more friction loss. so a 4 wheel drive would lose more.
gtfpv is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-08-2007, 12:40 PM   #32
prydey
Rob
 
prydey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Woodcroft S.A.
Posts: 21,737
Default

so a stock ef/el falcon should have about 125rwkw based on your theory. i've never seen that and i never will. facts speak a lot louder than theories. also based on a 20% loss stock ba sixes would be around 143rwkw. also a little optimistic if you ask me but not as far out as earlier cars.

drivelines have become more efficient in modern times, namely gearboxes.
prydey is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-08-2007, 01:02 PM   #33
Badcooky
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Badcooky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: My house
Posts: 1,637
Default

Prydey because ford tell us that the EF/EL had x kilowatt did it have it or does the one Ford put together for analysis have that kw.
Badcooky is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-08-2007, 01:04 PM   #34
burnz
VFII SS UTE
 
burnz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Central Coast
Posts: 6,353
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TUF240
but then if autos lose more power? y are they faster than the manuals down the quarter? in stock form that is? not bringing modded cars into it..
an auto has tourque multiplying factor's
manuel's do not
__________________
I don't often hear the sound of a screaming LSX.
But when I do, So do the neighbours..
GO SOUTHS
burnz is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-08-2007, 01:16 PM   #35
asusdragon
BA Falcon XT
 
asusdragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 848
Default

also over time the eninge become less efficant, so more loss of power from the start
__________________
Click here to check out my signature
http://i238.photobucket.com/albums/f...ignature-1.jpg

Quote:
If you can't fix it with a hammer. you're got an electrical problem
Quote:
You only need two tools in life - WD40 and Duct Tape. If it doesn't move and should, use the WD40, If it shouldnt move and does, use the duct tape
asusdragon is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-08-2007, 01:43 PM   #36
prydey
Rob
 
prydey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Woodcroft S.A.
Posts: 21,737
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Badcooky
Prydey because ford tell us that the EF/EL had x kilowatt did it have it or does the one Ford put together for analysis have that kw.
lets assume then that most ef/l falcons stock have somewhere around 100 - 110rwkw. based on forum members results this would seem pretty close. using a 20% drivetrain loss this would put the flywheel kw around 130 - 135. are the engines really going to be 20oddkw down on power. i had an el in 2000 so it was 3 yrs old and about 80 000km's so you wouldn't say the motor was tired, and yet in stock form it only achieved a touch over 100rwkw.

most stock vt/vx gen3's are around 160 - 170rwkw from a 220/225kw motor. most stock xr6t's are around the 180rwkw mark from a 240kw motor. most xr8's are around 200 from a 260kw motor etc etc. based on all these figures which are very average, 20% loss seems too little but 30% seems too much. all engines will vary from factory. there are freaks and lemons but to assume they are all down on the quoted factory figures is a bit out.

like i said a lot earlier though. does it really matter except for bragging rights. its just a number and maybe the difference between telling your mates you have cracked the 300kw with your motor, or fallen 15kw short. maybe a little of the mine's bigger than yours syndrome.

there's also the ageless debate over the accuracy of a lot of dyno's. ive seen quotes of up around 180rwkw in a ba but backed up by a 15sec 1/4 mile time, or 170 odd in a e series with a 14.4 1/4 time. i'm no expert but to me, one contradicts the other.

this could go on forever. how long is a piece of string?
prydey is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
This user likes this post:
Old 18-08-2007, 01:45 PM   #37
3vXT
...
 
3vXT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,046
Default

Modern cars do quarter mile times around 14.5 seconds.

Thats a pretty stupid thing to say because there are far to many variables, far to many cars and drivers and other things that make cars different from each other. I do realize that there are less variables in a gearbox, but suggesting that you can ACCURATELY work out drive train losses over hundreds of different gearbox's with a blanket 50kw or ANY percentage figure is just as stupid.

Vague generalisations FTL.
3vXT is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-08-2007, 04:18 PM   #38
Steffo
LPG > You
 
Steffo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sydney, NSW, Australia
Posts: 4,277
Default

The closest thing to a true global standard would be 18% manual, 20% auto. However, it differs from country to country, with Australia and its lot of dyno crowd inflating it big time (people on this forum have told me to expect 35% drivetrain losses before... lol!).

The truth is... wheel kW is a bunch of hooey. It means nothing, never did, never will, end of story. Its a gimmick to make some money off people in the aftermarket game. Chassis dyno's are excellent tuning devices and nothing more. Want a real indication of how powerful your car is? Take it to the strip stock, then take it to the strip after mods.
__________________
LPG Lovers Association President & Member #1.

:
Steffo is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 06:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL