|
|
The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
17-12-2011, 12:40 PM | #1 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 618
|
http://www.news.com.au/breaking-news...-1226224618091
THE NSW Government says variable tolls on Sydney's Harbour Bridge and Tunnel won't change, despite it having no effect on traffic congestion. In 2008 then Treasurer Eric Roozendal announced tolls on the bridge and tunnel would rise from $3 to $4 during peak periods in an effort to ease congestion. In July this year, Roads Minister Duncan Gay described the tolls as "unfair" as it penalised drivers from the north. Mr Gay said he had asked the RTA to look at the system. However the minister has now conceded that the tolls would stay because they generated more than $5 million in revenue per year. "The net present value of lost revenue to the Government from removing time-of-day tolling and reverting to a $3 toll is estimated to be $28.4 million over the next five years," Mr Gay told The Daily Telegraph. "Due to the costs involved I have no plans to remove time-of-day tolling from the Sydney Harbour Bridge or Tunnel." This was despite Mr Gay providing new data which showed the time-of-day tolling had not improved traffic flow on the major thoroughfares, with the number of peak-hour crossings falling just 0.19 per cent between 2008 and 2010. The variable tolls have seen motorists using the harbour crossings between 6.30am and 9.30am and 4pm and 7pm weekdays pay an increased toll of $4. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ let me get this right. they brought in higher tolls to ease congestion. it did'nt work. rather then scrap the toll that was proven not to work they keep it on because it steals money from the pocket of motorists. obviously, as i have noted before, the government and any other government we vote in wants to steal your money. is the legal recourse for motorists for this? |
||
17-12-2011, 01:13 PM | #2 | ||||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Sun City, North Australis
Posts: 4,274
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
You've seen it, you've heard it and your still asking questions?? Don't write off the Goose until you see the box going into the hole.... |
||||
17-12-2011, 01:38 PM | #3 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,063
|
toll.. or realy a different name for TAX! bridge is allready payed off!!! so why the need for a toll still? oops i meant TAX now!! Was $3 toll/TAX now with added $1 to round up to a $4 TAX- Oops i meant toll. All while admitting the extra Dollar TAX did not do a thing for congestion. Rather that empty peoples wallets faster.
Funny how the toll tarhets the "Northern side ricjh people while us Westies along the M4 have had the Toll taken away.. -YAY! |
||
17-12-2011, 03:23 PM | #4 | ||
Regular Schmuck
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,640
|
Yeah, I think the $1 extra to ease congestion was a load of old bollocks in order to justify an increase. If you're commuting into the city from the north, is $1 going to make you rethink your mode of transportation or your route? Of course not.
That $1 adds up in the government's coffers though. |
||
19-12-2011, 07:08 AM | #5 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: North Coast, NSW
Posts: 4,012
|
I must be old....
I remember when the bridge toll was raised from 20c to 40c !
__________________
|
||