|
|
OzECruisers General Discussions E/N/D vehicles General Discussion ONLY. NO TECH THREADS |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
21-06-2006, 06:28 PM | #1 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 60
|
simple question is a high flow cat nesscesary ie. if i put extractors and a cat-back exhast system on would the standerd cat make all of that pretty pointless?? :
__________________
: I HAVE A BIG RED SHINY CAR : |
||
21-06-2006, 06:31 PM | #2 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,382
|
no, apparantly the standard cats flow pretty well. But if yours is old and lookin a bit chewed, then I'd just get a new one and be done with it.
|
||
21-06-2006, 06:37 PM | #3 | ||
XRR83D
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Central Coast, NSW
Posts: 1,171
|
If your car is really old you probably want to replace the cat anyway and the hi flow will definately be worth investing in if your going to do everything else.
__________________
2003 BA XR8 Falcon - Lightning Strike Mods: 18" GT's (Aftermarket), BF GT front end(FibreSports), Tint, Premo Sound, Leather, CAI, DBA slotted, 2007 Suzuki Swift - Pearl Red Povo Pack |
||
21-06-2006, 06:43 PM | #4 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 60
|
thanks guys also what are likely power gains with a full exhaust system ie extractors+hi-flow cat + cat back???
__________________
: I HAVE A BIG RED SHINY CAR : |
||
21-06-2006, 06:44 PM | #5 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Under the bonnet, trying to keep as clean as above!
Posts: 1,354
|
whats the difference bettween the hi flow and normal ones? eg diameter sizes, material? differences other then the fact that one flows more.
|
||
21-06-2006, 06:54 PM | #6 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 8,303
|
For my 5.0's exhaust, I opted for standard cats. My system is slightly oversized for the engine's current output (twin 2.5" into single 3"), and the standard cats are definitely up to the job. High-flow cats should be for motors built to rev, or motors that gulp down a lot of air/fuel (ie forced induction), rather than near-stock setups.
I'm assuming the same would apply to the I6. |
||
21-06-2006, 06:57 PM | #7 | |||
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 8,303
|
Quote:
Once again, with I6, it could be different ;) |
|||
22-06-2006, 01:30 AM | #8 | ||
[ 5L ]
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: North Haven, Adelaide
Posts: 2,886
|
with I6 it is the same im sure, 2.5" cats but the flange is 2.25". my standard cat was stuffed so i got a hi-flo. the only thing i really noticed was it made a better exhaust noise, and it smells a bit more.
__________________
[ 5L ] 2001 AU series 2 xr8, 220kw, 5speed, leather interior, premium sound, narooma blue, cat back exhaust, k&n filter,willall edit,MSD coil packs, MSD leads, monroe gt gas shocks, superlow kingsprings 187rwkw (mainline) www.ignitionimages.com
|
||
22-06-2006, 09:21 AM | #9 | |||
Regular Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 80
|
Quote:
|
|||