Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-02-2014, 06:32 PM   #1
Road_Warrior
Pity the fool
 
Road_Warrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wait Awhile
Posts: 8,997
Thumbs down Car making and profits: mutually exclusive?

I'v often struggled with the idea that it is too expensive to make things here. Now that the domino effect of the death of the car makers is entering its final act, one thing looms large with them: they all make the same sort of car that people arent just into anymore.

Apart from the Territory, Ford, Holden and Toyota are all making sedans. Don't even mention the Cruze, the car is a joke compared to its competitors.

Assuming that you could keep your costs under control, and offered a car that was popular and able to be exported, could you do it profitably?

Given that the rise of the SUV is something that has occurred globally, Australia is not some unique market where everyone is running to SUVs and everyone elsewhere is still in Trabants or whatever.

Could SUV's or a pickup vehicle similar to the Ford Super Duty be profitably made in Australia? You'd need volume, or obscene markups if you didnt have volume. Is there a middle ground?

__________________
Fords I own or have owned:

1970 XW Falcon GT replica | 1970 XW Falcon | 1971 XY Fairmont | 1973 ZG Fairlane | 1986 XF Falcon panel van | 1987 XFII Falcon S-Pack | 1988 XF Falcon GLS ute | 1993 EBII Fairmont V8 | 1996 XG Falcon ute | 2000 AU Falcon wagon | 2004 BA Falcon XT | 2012 SZ Territory Titanium AWD

Proud to buy Australian and support Ford Australia through thick and thin
Road_Warrior is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 10-02-2014, 07:33 PM   #2
XR Martin
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
XR Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Canberra Region
Posts: 9,021
Default Re: Car making and profits: mutually exclusive?

Ford looked quite hard at whether the Ranger would work here, and it probably could have if it wasnt for our Free trade agreement with Thailand.
But they would also had to build the Everest to have made the numbers work.
__________________
2016 FGX XR8 Sprint, 6speed manual, Kinetic Blue #170

2004 BA wagon RTV project.

1998 EL XR8, Auto, Hot Chilli Red

1993 ED XR6, 5speed, Polynesian Green. 1 of 329. Retired

1968 XT Falcon 500 wagon, 3 on the tree, 3.6L. Patina project.
XR Martin is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 10-02-2014, 08:03 PM   #3
Windsor220
Now Fordless
 
Windsor220's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Fremantle, WA
Posts: 3,611
Default Re: Car making and profits: mutually exclusive?

The thing is the Falcon and Commodore were unique to Australia so it made sense to make them here. Yes I think you could build SUVs or small cars here but they are already being built somewhere else and cheaper so there is no point. I dont really see why Toyota ever built the Camry here. Didnt make much sense.

Someone else mentioned it in another thread recently that we have never had our own manufacturer. They are just Aussie divisions from another company in another country. Ford and Holden from America. Toyota, Mitsubishi and Nissan from Japan. If we had an Australian owned car manufacturer then they could have changed to something more suitable as times changed instead of packing up and leaving. They would have been calling the shots themselves.
Windsor220 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
4 users like this post:
Old 10-02-2014, 08:15 PM   #4
GQ_Smooth
Long live the inline 6
 
GQ_Smooth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 556
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Windsor220 View Post
The thing is the Falcon and Commodore were unique to Australia so it made sense to make them here. Yes I think you could build SUVs or small cars here but they are already being built somewhere else and cheaper so there is no point. I dont really see why Toyota ever built the Camry here. Didnt make much sense.

Someone else mentioned it in another thread recently that we have never had our own manufacturer. They are just Aussie divisions from another company in another country. Ford and Holden from America. Toyota, Mitsubishi and Nissan from Japan. If we had an Australian owned car manufacturer then they could have changed to something more suitable as times changed instead of packing up and leaving. They would have been calling the shots themselves.

Saab has shown how a global but relatively small Auto manufacturer will struggle to remain competitive and up to date, and will eventually be taken over by one of the majors when things get tough. The major players budgets are far to imposing to make a comparable car.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
His
2007 Mazda 6 MPS Leather Pack

Hers
BFII Ghia
GQ_Smooth is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 10-02-2014, 08:17 PM   #5
PlukaDuck
Regular Member
 
PlukaDuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 341
Default Re: Car making and profits: mutually exclusive?

ROAD-WARRIOR.......Great post.
Problem is Australians consumers need to set the terms.
If they buy a foreign car rather than say a Locally built ford territory then
sooner or later they will stop making the territory here.
At the end of the day the consumer dictates the market.
Australians are bringing this all on themselves.
Best-selling SUVs in January
1. Holden Captiva - 2155 . ............Foreign
2. Mazda CX-5 - 1625 ............Foreign
3. Hyundai ix35 - 1301 ............Foreign
4. Nissan X-Trail - 1294. ...........Foreign
5. Subaru Forester - 1246 ............Foreign
6. Ford Territory - 1161
7. Honda CR-V - 1117. ...........Foreign
8. Toyota Prado - 1048 ............Foreign
9. Nissan Dualis - 1033. ...........Foreign
10. Toyota Kluger - 960. ...........Foreign
__________________
NA ( normally aspirated )5.9 LITRE SMALLBLOCK.... 570KW / 740NM.
PlukaDuck is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 10-02-2014, 08:41 PM   #6
Spammy
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,094
Default Re: Car making and profits: mutually exclusive?

Car industry is similar to airline industry. Massive over capacity in the global market...some companies work out how to make a (small) profit all the time. others make profits now and then but then get lazy and drop the ball. Some companies have never made a profit and probably never will but they have backing from somebody or a government who is happy to top mpney in to keep it alive. Other companies just disappear.
Spammy is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 10-02-2014, 08:49 PM   #7
simon varley
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,884
Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: Bringing sanity to the Everest threads. 
Default Re: Car making and profits: mutually exclusive?

can the car industry work here? Absolutely.

but I think only with relatively small volume niche products. There is no way we can ever get the real economies of scale without exports, and the labor costs and FTA's wit the Asian markets mean we will always loose out.

Look at the small successful companies in England though - Caterham, Lotus, Triumph, Morgan - even Rolls, Aston and Jag - they make high profit margin low volume products so I reckon it's still possible here with the right product.
simon varley is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
7 users like this post:
Old 10-02-2014, 09:04 PM   #8
turbodewd
FG Falcon fan
 
turbodewd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Canberra, ACT
Posts: 913
Default Re: Car making and profits: mutually exclusive?

I agree with Simon above.

Australians are quite wealthy - on average (at the moment!) - compared to our Nth American or Euro cousins.

If only those damn idiot Captiva buyers bought a Territory! And if the NSW and Qld govts werent traitors too. They didnt have a high enough Aussie % in their fleets.
turbodewd is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 10-02-2014, 09:14 PM   #9
MITCHAY
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 13,457
Default Re: Car making and profits: mutually exclusive?

Quote:
Originally Posted by simon varley View Post
can the car industry work here? Absolutely.

but I think only with relatively small volume niche products. There is no way we can ever get the real economies of scale without exports, and the labor costs and FTA's wit the Asian markets mean we will always loose out.

Look at the small successful companies in England though - Caterham, Lotus, Triumph, Morgan - even Rolls, Aston and Jag - they make high profit margin low volume products so I reckon it's still possible here with the right product.
Exactly what I was thinking. Niche is the only way forward but of course would still need relevant support.

That way our high labour cost and everything else is irrelevant. People already pay stupid amounts for high end cars here in comparison to the rest of the world.

The only problem would be overcoming the reputation (perceived or actual) that has no doubt played a part in the demise of both Holden and Ford.
MITCHAY is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
This user likes this post:
Old 10-02-2014, 09:19 PM   #10
Maka
Au Falcon = Mr Reliable
 
Maka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: North West Slopes & Plains NSW
Posts: 4,076
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Embodiment of the AFF spirit in his efforts with ACP. 
Default Re: Car making and profits: mutually exclusive?

Quote:
Originally Posted by GQ_Smooth View Post
Saab has shown how a global but relatively small Auto manufacturer will struggle to remain competitive and up to date, and will eventually be taken over by one of the majors when things get tough. The major players budgets are far to imposing to make a comparable car.
Saab contributed to their own demise by selling underdone vehicles that were technically bland & not very innovative. An new totally Australian car manufacturer starting from scratch with plenty of $$$ & a niche cleansheet design that targets the needs of its core market with everything the Saab's lacked could be successful if there's enough vision & determination imo.

cheers, Maka
__________________
Ford AU Series Magazine Scans Here - www.fordforums.com.au/photos/index.php?cat=2792

Proud owner of a optioned keeper S1 Tickford Falcon AU XR6 VCT - "it's actually a better-balanced car than the XR8, goes almost as hard and uses about two-thirds of the fuel" (Drive.com 2007)
Maka is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 10-02-2014, 09:31 PM   #11
Spammy
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,094
Default Re: Car making and profits: mutually exclusive?

Quote:
Originally Posted by simon varley View Post
can the car industry work here?

Look at the small successful companies in England though - Caterham, Lotus, Triumph, Morgan - even Rolls, Aston and Jag - they make high profit margin low volume products so I reckon it's still possible here with the right product.
Lotus lost 167m quid last year
Caterham made a 600,000 quid profit in 2012
Jag appears to making a profit (hard to tell as the Indian owners lump the results togther with Land Rover) but did lose money for 30 years priior
Do Triumph make cars?
TVR appears to be dead forever now
Morgan makes a very modest profit some years
Aston lost 24 m quid in 2011 and 21 in 2012

Last edited by Spammy; 10-02-2014 at 09:50 PM.
Spammy is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
This user likes this post:
Old 10-02-2014, 09:38 PM   #12
PlukaDuck
Regular Member
 
PlukaDuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 341
Default Re: Car making and profits: mutually exclusive?

Quote:
Originally Posted by turbodewd View Post
I agree with Simon above.

Australians are quite wealthy - on average (at the moment!) - compared to our Nth American or Euro cousins.

If only those damn idiot Captiva buyers bought a Territory! And if the NSW and Qld govts werent traitors too. They didnt have a high enough Aussie % in their fleets.
YEAH RIGHT . But agree with other


Australia’s Personal Debt Reported As Highest In The World
http://www.creditcardfinder.com.au/a...the-world.html
__________________
NA ( normally aspirated )5.9 LITRE SMALLBLOCK.... 570KW / 740NM.
PlukaDuck is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 10-02-2014, 09:41 PM   #13
Spammy
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,094
Default Re: Car making and profits: mutually exclusive?

Quote:
Originally Posted by simon varley View Post
can the car industry work here? Absolutely.

but I think only with relatively small volume niche products. There is no way we can ever get the real economies of scale without exports, and the labor costs and FTA's wit the Asian markets mean we will always loose out.

Look at the small successful companies in England though - Caterham, Lotus, Triumph, Morgan - even Rolls, Aston and Jag - they make high profit margin low volume products so I reckon it's still possible here with the right product.
All of those brands have very long and well regarded pedigrees --- name me a few start ups that have managed to survive, be profitable and grow beyond a cottage indurstry in the auto industry.
Spammy is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 10-02-2014, 09:52 PM   #14
Bossxr8
Peter Car
 
Bossxr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
Default Re: Car making and profits: mutually exclusive?

Yeah you are right Spammy, niche manufacturers rarely survive. Just look how many different owners and how many bankruptcy's Lamborghini has had, Maserati too. Lotus is basically going nowhere, TVR and all the others are already gone. Without the backing of a major manufacturer prepared to put the money in and with the cost sharing involved with sharing parts and platforms from other cars, you are basically dead in the water. The new Lambo Hurrican will share a platform with Audi R8 for example.
Bossxr8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 10-02-2014, 09:54 PM   #15
XR Martin
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
XR Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Canberra Region
Posts: 9,021
Default Re: Car making and profits: mutually exclusive?

Bentley and Rolls didnt make money for decades until the krauts bought them.
__________________
2016 FGX XR8 Sprint, 6speed manual, Kinetic Blue #170

2004 BA wagon RTV project.

1998 EL XR8, Auto, Hot Chilli Red

1993 ED XR6, 5speed, Polynesian Green. 1 of 329. Retired

1968 XT Falcon 500 wagon, 3 on the tree, 3.6L. Patina project.
XR Martin is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
This user likes this post:
Old 10-02-2014, 09:59 PM   #16
Road_Warrior
Pity the fool
 
Road_Warrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wait Awhile
Posts: 8,997
Default Re: Car making and profits: mutually exclusive?

Quote:
Originally Posted by simon varley View Post
can the car industry work here? Absolutely.

but I think only with relatively small volume niche products. There is no way we can ever get the real economies of scale without exports, and the labor costs and FTA's wit the Asian markets mean we will always loose out.

Look at the small successful companies in England though - Caterham, Lotus, Triumph, Morgan - even Rolls, Aston and Jag - they make high profit margin low volume products so I reckon it's still possible here with the right product.
This is what i'm talking about. But not 'niche' as in supercars, niche as in SUV's and commercial vehicles to fill that gap that will be left globally when Toyota retire the 79 series.
__________________
Fords I own or have owned:

1970 XW Falcon GT replica | 1970 XW Falcon | 1971 XY Fairmont | 1973 ZG Fairlane | 1986 XF Falcon panel van | 1987 XFII Falcon S-Pack | 1988 XF Falcon GLS ute | 1993 EBII Fairmont V8 | 1996 XG Falcon ute | 2000 AU Falcon wagon | 2004 BA Falcon XT | 2012 SZ Territory Titanium AWD

Proud to buy Australian and support Ford Australia through thick and thin
Road_Warrior is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 10-02-2014, 09:59 PM   #17
aussie muscle
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
aussie muscle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,312
Default Re: Car making and profits: mutually exclusive?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Windsor220 View Post
I dont really see why Toyota ever built the Camry here. Didnt make much sense.
You'd be better looking at niche products, like cheap sports car (DRB) or ruggedized offroader. doing a mainstream car is getting too hard without protection or assistance.
__________________
My ride: 2007 Falcon Ute BF XR8 Orange, MTO.
aussie muscle is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 10-02-2014, 10:11 PM   #18
Spammy
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,094
Default Re: Car making and profits: mutually exclusive?

Niche market SUV???

BMW already sell 4 different sizes of SUV with however many different engines/ Mercedes have 4 SUV sizes and loads of engine combos/ Audi have 3 SUV sizes with loads of differnet engines. Toyota, Mazda and Nissan all have god knows how many SUV variants. Jeep sell SUVs in every size...add in Fiat/Renault/PUG/VW/Kia/Huyndia and you get another 20 or so SUVs

What niche in the SUV market is currently not over catered for?
Spammy is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
4 users like this post:
Old 10-02-2014, 10:17 PM   #19
Road_Warrior
Pity the fool
 
Road_Warrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wait Awhile
Posts: 8,997
Default Re: Car making and profits: mutually exclusive?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spammy View Post
Niche market SUV???

BMW already sell 4 different sizes of SUV with however many different engines/ Mercedes have 4 SUV sizes and loads of engine combos/ Audi have 3 SUV sizes with loads of differnet engines. Toyota, Mazda and Nissan all have god knows how many SUV variants. Jeep sell SUVs in every size...add in Fiat/Renault/PUG/VW/Kia/Huyndia and you get another 20 or so SUVs

What niche in the SUV market is currently not over catered for?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Road_Warrior
This is what i'm talking about. But not 'niche' as in supercars, niche as in SUV's and commercial vehicles to fill that gap that will be left globally when Toyota retire the 79 series.
And by way of reference Toyota sells roughly 6500 70 series Landcruisers globally - per month.
__________________
Fords I own or have owned:

1970 XW Falcon GT replica | 1970 XW Falcon | 1971 XY Fairmont | 1973 ZG Fairlane | 1986 XF Falcon panel van | 1987 XFII Falcon S-Pack | 1988 XF Falcon GLS ute | 1993 EBII Fairmont V8 | 1996 XG Falcon ute | 2000 AU Falcon wagon | 2004 BA Falcon XT | 2012 SZ Territory Titanium AWD

Proud to buy Australian and support Ford Australia through thick and thin
Road_Warrior is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 10-02-2014, 10:31 PM   #20
Spammy
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,094
Default Re: Car making and profits: mutually exclusive?

Probably a half decent business case for building a replacement for the 70 series == but not here in OZ given high cost of labour. I think Toyota/GM / Ford all worked that out sometime over the last few months,
Spammy is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 10-02-2014, 11:42 PM   #21
jpblue1000
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
jpblue1000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 2,252
Default Re: Car making and profits: mutually exclusive?

we should be building wind turbines, or packaged power generators or trains or ships, flat pack houses, bridges. High value, complex, technological items where the labour cost and vagaries of international currency is partially irrelevant. We should be building things others cant and not giving our secrets away so they can build it after buying one.
Australians can make stuff, just not mass produced cars profitably. we need to think smart about building what others cant or wont.

JP
jpblue1000 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
4 users like this post:
Old 10-02-2014, 11:57 PM   #22
DoreSlamR
Fiat POWAAH!
 
DoreSlamR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,309
Default Re: Car making and profits: mutually exclusive?

[QUOTE=PlukaDuck]
1. Holden Captiva - 2155

Scary.

This is one of the reasons why the Australia car industry is gone to the dogs.

I'd hazard a guess the Craptiva is the cheapest SUV option?

Do people not test drive cars back to back anymore? It is the worst built out of the 10, yet is the best seller.........

I would love to see a survey of new car buyers, see what goes through their heads when purchasing. Not a lot for some I suspect!
__________________
Holden: If you cant beat them, buy them.
DoreSlamR is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
This user likes this post:
Old 11-02-2014, 12:02 AM   #23
Spammy
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,094
Default Re: Car making and profits: mutually exclusive?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jpblue1000 View Post
we should be building wind turbines, or packaged power generators or trains or ships, flat pack houses, bridges. High value, complex, technological items where the labour cost and vagaries of international currency is partially irrelevant. We should be building things others cant and not giving our secrets away so they can build it after buying one.
Australians can make stuff, just not mass produced cars profitably. we need to think smart about building what others cant or wont.

JP
Manufacturing is 7% of our economy and yes we need to play to our strenghts and concentrate on high value, high tech --- not building cars with a backdrop of a small local market, high labour costs, barriers to export and cars that are past their use by date.
Spammy is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-02-2014, 12:06 AM   #24
Spammy
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,094
Default Re: Car making and profits: mutually exclusive?

[QUOTE=DoreSlamR;5018447]
Quote:
Originally Posted by PlukaDuck
1. Holden Captiva - 2155

Scary.

This is one of the reasons why the Australia car industry is gone to the dogs.

I'd hazard a guess the Craptiva is the cheapest SUV option?

Do people not test drive cars back to back anymore? It is the worst built out of the 10, yet is the best seller.........

I would love to see a survey of new car buyers, see what goes through their heads when purchasing. Not a lot for some I suspect!
Buyers who really care about handling and precision build quality buy a BMW or Merc. Everyone else fights it out on features, cost and percived brand value.

Where does that leave a car that is not a Merc or BMW, has poor brand perception, is not a price leader and has limited features?
Spammy is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-02-2014, 12:19 AM   #25
DoreSlamR
Fiat POWAAH!
 
DoreSlamR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,309
Default Re: Car making and profits: mutually exclusive?

Yeah it's a tough market I know.

It's sad, Holden will be gone in a few years, but we'll still probably be able to buy these "gems" like Captiva and cruize and trax
__________________
Holden: If you cant beat them, buy them.
DoreSlamR is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-02-2014, 12:22 AM   #26
Rockape
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Rockape's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Mandurah W.A
Posts: 503
Default Re: Car making and profits: mutually exclusive?

How many of those Captiva buyers thought they were getting Australian made ? It is a Holden after all.
__________________
PX1 Ranger

Kawasaki ZZR1100
Rockape is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
2 users like this post:
Old 11-02-2014, 12:23 AM   #27
JG33
Regular Member
 
JG33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Perth
Posts: 282
Default Re: Car making and profits: mutually exclusive?

Quote:
Originally Posted by turbodewd View Post
I agree with Simon above.

If only those damn idiot Captiva buyers bought a Territory!
Funny you say that, friends of ours had a Territory sold it and bought a Captiva because it was cheaper to run than the Territory and they're well off.

Go figure.
JG33 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
This user likes this post:
Old 11-02-2014, 01:43 AM   #28
Pepscobra
Call me dirt... Joe Dirt
 
Pepscobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Back in Perth for good
Posts: 5,302
Default Re: Car making and profits: mutually exclusive?

As a new father, I am petrified for the future of my children... what will people be doing for work in 20-30 years in Australia?
All the iron-ore will be gone...
Coffee will be $28/cup...
Where will our economy be?
__________________
2007 BFII FPV Cobra Ute|Boss 302|6M|#23/100
Mods so far:
Billet Products Shifter|X-Force Exhaust|Herrod Oil Breathers|Whiteline Sway Bar|Tein SuperStreets|Kings FOR-303SL Rear Springs|Melling Oil Pump|Mace Manifold Spacers|Powerbond Underdrives|Pacemaker Headers|Ballistic Cats|XFT Custom Tune @ 308.3rwkw|DBA T3 Rotors|Ferodo Pads|Goodridge Braided Lines
Mods to come:
4.11 Diff Gears|Chromoly Tailshaft
I use & recommend:
Castrol|Motorcraft|Mainlube|Penrite


Check Out My Build Thread
Pepscobra is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-02-2014, 02:16 AM   #29
PlukaDuck
Regular Member
 
PlukaDuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 341
Default Re: Car making and profits: mutually exclusive?

[QUOTE=Spammy;5018449]
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoreSlamR View Post

Buyers who really care about handling and precision build quality buy a BMW or Merc. Everyone else fights it out on features, cost and percived brand value.

Where does that leave a car that is not a Merc or BMW, has poor brand perception, is not a price leader and has limited features?
Spammy.
Your dreaming if you think a merc and a BMW is ALL THAT.
There taxis in Europe. Just like the falcon and commodore is here.
Another example of a mislead ausrtralian believing he is something special because he drives a car that an advertisement says makes him special if he drives it.
Here is a link to your overpriced EURO TRASH being flogged to death by American muscle
http://www.streetfire.net/video/corv...ago_701287.htm
__________________
NA ( normally aspirated )5.9 LITRE SMALLBLOCK.... 570KW / 740NM.
PlukaDuck is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 11-02-2014, 02:21 AM   #30
PlukaDuck
Regular Member
 
PlukaDuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 341
Default Re: Car making and profits: mutually exclusive?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pepscobra View Post
As a new father, I am petrified for the future of my children... what will people be doing for work in 20-30 years in Australia?
All the iron-ore will be gone...
Coffee will be $28/cup...
Where will our economy be?
I agree with you peps
But don't worry because there is enough iron ore in this country to last 300 years.
Brazil is the biggest iron ore producer in the world
Don't believe all the **** you read in the Australian media
I have worked all over the world in oil and gas and mining and believe me we are just a drop in the ocean here.
But unfortunately we are fast becoming a 2nd world country
__________________
NA ( normally aspirated )5.9 LITRE SMALLBLOCK.... 570KW / 740NM.
PlukaDuck is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
This user likes this post:
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 09:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL