|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
20-03-2006, 12:52 PM | #1 | ||
G&D Performance Australia
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 295
|
In clarification with regard to our recent AU I6 Airbox test:
1. The air box & intake pipe used for the base test was not the standard factory unit. This test was only about a comparison of Caspers car in its prior state for before & after purposes. 2. The dyno graph published starts at 3600rpm due to the fact that the car has a 3000rpm stall converter & needs to be run past the converter at the beginning of the run for accurate results. 3. The 4 kw gain seen at 3600 rpm was a comparison against Caspers intake which had a 3 inch steel intake pipe running into an internal pod filter inside the factory box. There is no internal bell mouth on either filter or pipe.We believe that this may hurt intake air speed hence our results found in the paragraph below. 4. We tested this 3 inch steel inlet pipe in conjunction with our air box system & found a 2-3 kw loss across the entire rev range. Had the factory inlet pipe been used in the initial dyno run then the difference @ 3600rpm may have only been 1-2 kw’s.This test was not about that though, it was only to compare against what the car came here with. All work was performed on the dyno & on the same day. As we all know too well different days & different atmostpheric conditions can see varying results. 5. We posted this dyno graph showing air fuel ratio’s just to dispel any major ECU relearn concerns. 6. We have seen on average 10rwkw’s gain on each & every AU V8 we’ve fitted our box to & to be honest I would have been happy to see 5kw’s from the I6. I’m not saying that we’ll see the gains we’ve seen on Caspers VCT on every other AU I6.As for that we’ll just have to wait & see as our R&D progresses.We’ll keep you all posted. Regards Glenn Last edited by G&D PERFORMANCE; 20-03-2006 at 12:58 PM. Reason: Adding Dyno Graph |
||
20-03-2006, 12:57 PM | #2 | ||
OLD SKOOL BABY
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,688
|
:
Well said Glenn, looking forward to it on my ute. As soon as Caspers is done . :evilking: Mick.
__________________
XB Sedan - Trick Mansweto built 351 3V Alloy Headed Cleveland,Demon Carby ontop of CHI Hi Rise Manifold - 600HP 83 F100 XLT - 351 Cleveland C6 Auto wrapped in Black snake skin vinyl, daily tow rig.1976 XB GS COUPE (waiting to start the rebuild)
|
||
20-03-2006, 01:00 PM | #3 | ||
Adapt or perish...
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dip!@#$
Posts: 7,954
|
Can't argue with that.
Small question, how much the airbox supply only Glenn?
__________________
Carless
|
||
20-03-2006, 02:07 PM | #4 | ||
Oh Yeah!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Manhattan, NY
Posts: 1,023
|
Any pics of what it looks like in the car?
How much is the expected cost
__________________
Oh no! Duffman can't breath! Oh, yeah! |
||
20-03-2006, 03:38 PM | #5 | ||
G&D Performance Australia
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 295
|
Pics are available in the G&D forum & on here in the G&D AU 6 flash tune thread.
Cost is $645 plus $66 fitting |
||
20-03-2006, 03:50 PM | #6 | ||
GT-P #0336
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,360
|
I think you guys have unecessarily explained yourselves enough in regards to the box results. It works. End of story!
Now, on another note, why is my car still sitting in MY driveway when it should be in YOURS!
__________________
2003 FULLY OPTIONED MERCURY SILVER BA GT-P BUILD #336
REVERSE CAMERA - SAT NAV - PIONEER SUB & AMP - SUNROOF - DVD PLAYER - CUSTOM DUAL EXHAUST ~Tuned By Bluepower Racing~ |
||
20-03-2006, 03:54 PM | #7 | |||
Built Ford Tough
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: State of Euphoria Mod: F-Series
Posts: 3,035
|
Quote:
here, just curious which price is correct?
__________________
Black on white '83 SWB F100 C6 auto 351C on gas and on the ground --> Project Thread '55 F100, just a roller at the moment, new project Silver MY12 Volkswagen Amarok |
|||
20-03-2006, 05:58 PM | #9 | |||
Living the dream
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NSW
Posts: 1,795
|
Quote:
For those who are curious as to airbox results, mine should give a reasonable example; stock I6 going in for extractors, exhaust, cat and airbox mods. Hopefully all done wednesday :sm_headba |
|||
20-03-2006, 09:02 PM | #10 | ||
TL40 Wagon?
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,377
|
Glenn I am NOT a believer at all but...... you guys are thorough and you post up some good detailed explanations that I am running out of arguments against.
So i throw away my home built effort put back the stupid looking 55m concentrator part of the AU plastic inlet and run the G7D airbox and I will get up to 10rwkw. I would be happy with 5 for $700 if it works. maybe i will try |
||
20-03-2006, 09:05 PM | #11 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,083
|
Quote:
__________________
Older, wiser, poorer. Now in Euro-Trash. VW Coupe V6 4motion.
|
|||
20-03-2006, 11:03 PM | #12 | ||
TBA Customs
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: giving you what you need
Posts: 3,275
|
So this was a 10kw gain at the wheels with nothing but the box?? no edit??
If thats the case then shouldn't you guys be backing up these numbers with at least a couple more cars, I don't mean to be sceptical but unfortunately I am, I don't see how just a box can give this much gain. If you guys can back these numbers then that would go a long way to convincing critics like me. My ute is available if you like its an AU II XR6 VCT, I don't want any freebies don't get me wrong, just would like to see for myself. |
||
20-03-2006, 11:07 PM | #13 | ||
OLD SKOOL BABY
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,688
|
Here we go again : : :
__________________
XB Sedan - Trick Mansweto built 351 3V Alloy Headed Cleveland,Demon Carby ontop of CHI Hi Rise Manifold - 600HP 83 F100 XLT - 351 Cleveland C6 Auto wrapped in Black snake skin vinyl, daily tow rig.1976 XB GS COUPE (waiting to start the rebuild)
|
||
20-03-2006, 11:07 PM | #14 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,083
|
Quote:
I expect my airbox was actually crap and that the 10rwkw was more that possible on my particular car.
__________________
Older, wiser, poorer. Now in Euro-Trash. VW Coupe V6 4motion.
|
|||
20-03-2006, 11:11 PM | #15 | |||
TBA Customs
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: giving you what you need
Posts: 3,275
|
Quote:
|
|||
20-03-2006, 11:15 PM | #16 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,083
|
Quote:
__________________
Older, wiser, poorer. Now in Euro-Trash. VW Coupe V6 4motion.
|
|||
20-03-2006, 11:21 PM | #17 | ||
TBA Customs
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: giving you what you need
Posts: 3,275
|
Might be good to see the comparisons done between the factory boxes and this one, seeing as how their would be spares you should see what the diffesrence would be on yours as well, for parity and also equalising all variables. At least this way you could get a good average between the three cars.
Good Luck |
||
21-03-2006, 01:05 AM | #18 | |||
BA GT-P Owner
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In the GT-P
Posts: 1,599
|
Quote:
__________________
DAILY DRIVER/TRACK CAR BUILD NUMBER 006 299.5 rwkw's 12.74 @108mph ON MT's ON MAXXIS MAV1's 275/45/17 13.27 @ 106mph
|
|||
21-03-2006, 02:04 AM | #19 | |||
Highway Taxi
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 593
|
Quote:
__________________
Close only counts in Horse Shoes & Hand Grenades. :evil_laug |
|||
21-03-2006, 06:04 AM | #20 | |||
Regular Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Lurking in the Cave...
Posts: 70
|
Quote:
1. The larger filter will have lower air velocity through the media and this may promote less turbulence, or even laminar flow within the intake piping. This would be a good thing, as the pressure drop would be surprisingly low. Somebody with more knowledge of Reynolds numbers for air may be able to advise here. 2. The standard AU tapered intake pipe may be reflecting the intake pulses back toward the intake valves causing a scavenging effect on air from the filter. I've read somewhere that the AU standard intake has an efficiency of greater than 100%, and this pulsing might explain that. Because the taper is long, the effect is probably reduced, but will occur over a greater RPM range. Possibly a shorter tapered section could be trialled, to match the RPM range of the cam being used and the BBM runners in effect at that range. Just my 2c worth....feel free to correct me please |
|||
21-03-2006, 06:55 PM | #21 | ||
now with 3.73 lsd
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 559
|
2 things i wanna ask
why are the air fuel mixtures the same and why is there a increase in power but no major change in air-fuel ratio im not dusputing the power gain just wondering thats all
__________________
g6e turbo |
||
21-03-2006, 07:17 PM | #22 | |||
BIG LUKE
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Altona, Vic
Posts: 556
|
Quote:
It has leaned out the mixtures a bit over the top of the run which would obviously tell us that there is more air available to the engine in this RPM range. This would also prove that there was a restriction in the air intake that has been partially rectified. Well I can see the difference, can't anyone else????? Its all there on the dyno sheet. And how rich do these cars run with a factory tune???? WOW LUKE
__________________
I am like 7/11, I am not always doing business, but I am always open! XR6BBQ.......... Just when you thought I had given up!!!
|
|||
21-03-2006, 07:17 PM | #23 | |||
Regular Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Lurking in the Cave...
Posts: 70
|
Quote:
In fact, the air-fuel ratio on the dyno chart is more constant over the RPM range tested with the G&D CAI than with the previous intake design which richens out past the peak power RPM, so the burning efficiency at high RPM may be better, and certainly will be more tunable with an edit. This also shows that the engine may be given a more radical cam without CAI restriction limiting the engines breathing capacity. |
|||
21-03-2006, 07:27 PM | #24 | ||
now with 3.73 lsd
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 559
|
ok
i just found it strange that such an increase in power didnt really change the air fuel ratio much thats all
__________________
g6e turbo |
||
21-03-2006, 07:37 PM | #25 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ipswich QLD
Posts: 4,697
|
now i get it, thats much easy to under stand now
one question... whats a bellmouth and how does it work for improvments? Also with the air intake u use, is it possible 4 too much air to get in the box or is it the more the merrier? |
||
21-03-2006, 07:49 PM | #26 | |||
Regular Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Lurking in the Cave...
Posts: 70
|
Quote:
|
|||