Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 25-09-2006, 06:38 AM   #1
Timeshift
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 83
Default Ford and GM merger talk?

I happened to come across http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/forum...s.cfm?t=593853 based on the news article http://www.usatoday.com/money/autos/...ord-usat_x.htm and being a Ford man myself, took some interest in reading it. The comments "Exactly! Bring on the Falcodore!" and "I predict a million bogans would be crying over this one." made me laugh especially :

I don't think it's feasible though.

Timeshift is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-09-2006, 09:18 AM   #2
XRQTR
TBA Customs
 
XRQTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: giving you what you need
Posts: 3,275
Default

With the market share spread over such a wide base, this would be an extremely productive move in light of dwindling sales for both companies, perhaps not a complete merger but some kind of collaberation on future models. This would benefit both companies simply in the savings that would be achieved on R+D, not to mention the time factor with two sets of heads wrapped around a common goal.

In saying this though, I really can't see this happening in the near future only because of the diehard element that would be lost due to a merger such as this one. However this does not mean to say that they would not join forces, 'covertly' if you like, to perhaps come up with better fuel systems or other fuel/energy saving devices, it could only benefit both companies in the long term.

So unless fuel prices drop down below the $1 mark this could be a possibilty as sales keep dropping with people searching for more fuel efficient cars or alternative transport. Even something as simple as car pooling could effectively kill off alot of manufacturers simply because cars would last longer having done much less kilometres, not too mention the fuel savings to owners effectively cutting fuel bills by up to 80%, being the main reason I can't understand why more people don't car pool.
XRQTR is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-09-2006, 10:08 AM   #3
Bud Bud
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 665
Default

This is a good thread and actually has some merit! It may just be a necessary evil as Toyota pushes GM and Ford Globally to the brink. Holden may never be able to spend a billion dollars on a Commodore ever again, (it was Zeta that cost a billion dollars, not just the Commodore as everyone seems to think) unless for them, the overseas market continues to grow.

Ford Aus are in a similar state. The Orion could really be the last Falcon in a shrinking market simply just because of cost. After all it has come very close to this in the past already, and things weren’t this bad on the global or domestic market as it is now.

The Chrysler Crossfire would never have happened unless it shared the Merc SLK platform. The "new" Beetle is straight of the Passat platform, and yet neither look anything alike their donor's platform. Note: Platform does not mean floor.

I know that these companies are the same or related but it does show what can be achieved with a concept after the platform has been engineered. This is the most expensive part and this is where Ford and GM can share and benefit from each other. This does not mean that the cars will look the same or be powered by the same drive trains.

Globally both companies are in real trouble and while GM has more financial resources than Ford neither are in good enough shape to hold back Toyota as separate entities. But if they were smart enough to share some resources in the future well….
Bud Bud is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-09-2006, 07:15 PM   #4
Steve
torque is your friend
 
Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 667
Default

I don't see why a colaboration of some sort can't be entered into. It's been done before quite successfully, a perfect example is the Douvrin PRV V6 that was produced out of a collaboration between Peugeot, Renault and Volvo.
__________________
Support Cystic Fibrosis Australia
Learn about it here, donate and help the research into finding a cure and to provide services for children living with CF and their families.
Steve is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-09-2006, 07:27 PM   #5
uranium_death
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
uranium_death's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Gren A Waverrey
Posts: 2,415
Default

If the Falcon and Commode were make into a common car, imagine how much **** they'd kick with the Ford's Inline 6, the Commodore's 8 with the Ford's six speed.

Toyota would truly become the true gutless piece of **** car company.
uranium_death is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-09-2006, 07:31 PM   #6
Sourbastard
Moderator
Contributing Member
 
Sourbastard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Adelaide SA
Posts: 5,584
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by uranium_death
If the Falcon and Commode were make into a common car, imagine how much **** they'd kick with the Ford's Inline 6, the Commodore's 8 with the Ford's six speed.

Toyota would truly become the true gutless piece of **** car company.
Or more likely the power of the gemini, the spaciousness of a Ford Ka and the reliability of the BTR in todays market.
__________________

1965 XP Falcon Deluxe Sedan
1978 XC Falcon Wagon Rallypack
2003 BA Fairlane G220

Windsor Powah!!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7hT9dxD2hM

Sourbastard is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-09-2006, 07:33 PM   #7
MoreHPformyXR6
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
MoreHPformyXR6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: FoMoCo
Posts: 3,441
Default

The Orion could really be the last Falcon in a shrinking market simply just because of cost. Is the Orion just the project name for the new Falcon? Or is the base model Flacon going to be called Orion? In same way that base model VE Commodore is Omega. Also does anyone know what series the new Orion would be eg B?
__________________
FGX XR6 Lightning Strike Sedan

BA XR6 Mk II Shockwave Sedan - Now Sold - gone but not forgotten

mods: 20% under drive, Pacemaker Comps 4495' (ceramic coated) , 3' Metal Cat, XR6T exhaust - twin 3' tips, F6 CAI, K&N panel filter, PWR trans cooler, customed tuned by Heinrich Performance Tuning HPT 183.7rwkw.


Quote:
Originally Posted by ATMO SIX
You have become the new SLOANY mate, no real quality to your current post(s).
MoreHPformyXR6 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-09-2006, 07:35 PM   #8
Steve
torque is your friend
 
Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 667
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sourbastard
Or more likely the power of the gemini, the spaciousness of a Ford Ka and the reliability of the BTR in todays market.
Although your comment is a "bit" of an exaggeration, I agree with you. If they were to merge and produce just one line of cars, we'd get total rubbish. The current competition needs to be maintained.
__________________
Support Cystic Fibrosis Australia
Learn about it here, donate and help the research into finding a cure and to provide services for children living with CF and their families.
Steve is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-09-2006, 07:59 PM   #9
David See
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
David See's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 648
Default

ok, that's it - I'm psychic.

This morning I was driving to work and thought to myself - I wonder what would happen if Ford and Holden joined forces?

Now I come home to find this thread!
David See is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-09-2006, 10:21 PM   #10
Abacus
Life's a Gas
 
Abacus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,029
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by uranium_death
If the Falcon and Commode were make into a common car, imagine how much **** they'd kick with the Ford's Inline 6, the Commodore's 8 with the Ford's six speed.
Trouble is, they wouldn't necessarily pick the best components. With the loss of mutual competition they would be more likely to choose components on the basis of cost.
Abacus is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-09-2006, 10:56 PM   #11
Longreach
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Geraldton WA
Posts: 68
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Abacus
Trouble is, they wouldn't necessarily pick the best components. With the loss of mutual competition they would be more likely to choose components on the basis of cost.
Yet wouldn't a partial reason for the merger be the dominance of toyota??
So wouldn't there still be competition?
Longreach is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-09-2006, 11:03 PM   #12
Psycho Chicken
Banned
 
Psycho Chicken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: South East Melbourne
Posts: 6,156
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Longreach
Yet wouldn't a partial reason for the merger be the dominance of toyota??
So wouldn't there still be competition?
Yep, competion for FWD 4s and 6s. Bye bye RWD and V8s.
Psycho Chicken is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-09-2006, 11:07 PM   #13
Longreach
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Geraldton WA
Posts: 68
Default

Oh ye i get ya, fair enough.
What is the benifients of FWD over RWD??
Like what would remove RWD from the areana all together?
Longreach is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-09-2006, 11:09 PM   #14
Sourbastard
Moderator
Contributing Member
 
Sourbastard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Adelaide SA
Posts: 5,584
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve
Although your comment is a "bit" of an exaggeration, I agree with you. If they were to merge and produce just one line of cars, we'd get total rubbish. The current competition needs to be maintained.
I never exaggerate. Car companies are all run by geniuses.
__________________

1965 XP Falcon Deluxe Sedan
1978 XC Falcon Wagon Rallypack
2003 BA Fairlane G220

Windsor Powah!!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7hT9dxD2hM

Sourbastard is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-09-2006, 11:31 PM   #15
Steve
torque is your friend
 
Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 667
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sourbastard
I never exaggerate. Car companies are all run by geniuses.
I just fell off my chair.
__________________
Support Cystic Fibrosis Australia
Learn about it here, donate and help the research into finding a cure and to provide services for children living with CF and their families.
Steve is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-09-2006, 11:40 PM   #16
uranium_death
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
uranium_death's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Gren A Waverrey
Posts: 2,415
Default

I guess the lesson is that Toyota is evil.
I think the new Camry looks like box with rounded edges. I hope they've fixed the interior. I prefer to sit on cloth, not plastic.

Last edited by uranium_death; 25-09-2006 at 11:40 PM. Reason: Butter on the wall.
uranium_death is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-09-2006, 12:17 AM   #17
Bossxr8
Peter Car
 
Bossxr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
Default

Ford and GM have already worked together on a few projects before, including a 6 speed auto joint venture for small cars, so this is nothing new and may result in further joint venture programs to reduce R&D costs. Merger talk is just crap. Wouldn't happen in a million years.

Has nothing to do with Ford Australia and Holden.
Bossxr8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-09-2006, 12:19 AM   #18
Bossxr8
Peter Car
 
Bossxr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MoreHPformyXR6
The Orion could really be the last Falcon in a shrinking market simply just because of cost. Is the Orion just the project name for the new Falcon? Or is the base model Flacon going to be called Orion? In same way that base model VE Commodore is Omega. Also does anyone know what series the new Orion would be eg B?
Orion is the project name. No one will know what the model code will be until a few months before the release, it certainly wouldn't have been thought up yet.
Bossxr8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-09-2006, 12:28 AM   #19
uranium_death
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
uranium_death's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Gren A Waverrey
Posts: 2,415
Default

Although Orion sounds all futuristic and all, everything that was once futuristic eventually becomes outdated.

For this, I hope they keep the name "Falcon".
uranium_death is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-09-2006, 12:30 AM   #20
Bossxr8
Peter Car
 
Bossxr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by uranium_death
Although Orion sounds all futuristic and all, everything that was once futuristic eventually becomes outdated.

For this, I hope they keep the name "Falcon".
Of course it will be Falcon, why would they throw away over 45 years of history for a risky name change, especially with the way the market is going. It would be suicidal.
Bossxr8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-09-2006, 08:56 AM   #21
Bud Bud
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 665
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bossxr8
Of course it will be Falcon, why would they throw away over 45 years of history for a risky name change, especially with the way the market is going. It would be suicidal.
At the moment I think you are right, but sales for the Falcon and Commodore are slipping fast. The Commodore means as much to the Holden faithful as the Falcon does to the Ford.

The Commodore has an incredible race heritage constructed over thirty years and has at one point recently as we know, outsold the Falcon two to one but even Mooney has indicated that the Commodore may have run its last race.

He has been quoted as saying something like "We may have to look beyond the Commodore in the Future" or words to that effect.
Bud Bud is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-09-2006, 12:31 PM   #22
suttoinc
The Phantom Menace
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Victoria
Posts: 60
Default

And then there were two car companies:
one who made cars for people that liked cars
and one for people that like whitegoods
suttoinc is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-09-2006, 12:58 PM   #23
turboute
turboute
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 502
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Longreach
What is the benifients of FWD over RWD??
It's cheaper to build (not really better in any other way, RWD is usually better for servicing, robustness and handling).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Longreach
Like what would remove RWD from the areana all together?
with any luck it will never be removed, there will always be people who will pay a bit more to have a premium product. Why else would the BMW 1 series be selling?

The only Viable alternative would be all cars going to 4WD, but even then there will be people still wanting RWD only.
turboute is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-09-2006, 01:14 PM   #24
4.9 EF Futura
Official AFF conservative
 
4.9 EF Futura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Adelaide, SA
Posts: 3,549
Default

In order for it to work, it'd require a MASSIVE restructuring of the companies - something that both GM and Ford have been unwilling to accept individually (granted there are a lot of stakeholders who also dont want this to occur... unions, suppliers etc)... I dont see how this would change under an alliance.

Im not sure how it works in the states but over here, the manufacturers obviously source a lot of parts from the same suppliers already.

Also... ive seen what happens when you take 2 big, weak companies and join them together. You get one huge, weak company.... which promptly falls on its behind.

I certainly wouldnt read too much into the "discussions". Big business constantly float the ideas between each other. They can then write into their strategic plan "we're always looking for merger/alliance opportunities".
__________________
A cup half empty... but full of euphoria.
4.9 EF Futura is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-09-2006, 01:18 PM   #25
red_hotxr6
Banned
 
red_hotxr6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: brisbane
Posts: 2,039
Cool

It will never happen. Ever. Go ford.
red_hotxr6 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-09-2006, 02:43 PM   #26
XRQTR
TBA Customs
 
XRQTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: giving you what you need
Posts: 3,275
Default

GM Oz has done well, kept their sales up anyway, by way of their export of the Commodore, Ford Oz really need to look very seriously if they want to keep manufacturing in Oz.

China would be one of the most lucrative markets in todays economy not just because of the obvious new money, but also because China is not bound ,to the best of my knowledge anyway, to the Euro3 guidelines. This would be quite advantageous to anyone with a heap of shelf stock, it would not necessarily be Eco-Unfriendly, simply not the latest tech. Many US car manufacturers are doing this now, where they sell or move their old casting and dye equipment to manufacturers in China who in turn produce the superseded cars on mass. It actually works quite well because this way companies make the money they need from equipment that would otherwise lay practically dorment, while in return get the spare parts for said cars back home at a much cheaper price thereby helping sales on the home market.

This would/could obviously inject massive funding back into R+D instead of trying to always figure out where to slash costs in order to pay for the next models.

Another avenue could of course be moving towards smaller more compact cars to send back into the European markets. As this is the way most of Europe is going it would make sense to perhaps give them what they want instead of trying to convince them to take what they don't really need. I think that when the Australian based companies stop following the US lead example of bigger is better they will move ahead in leaps and bounds, I mean it's not the Euro Co's that are facing bad times, if anything they are creeping ever further into new territories previously held by Ford and GM. With the Australian product pricing getting closer to that of the import it's no wonder they are losing customers.

Just a thought.
XRQTR is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 07:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL